Cubic
Automated code review
Manual reviews couldn't keep pace. Claude now uses IDE tools to validate logic, cutting first reviews from hours to minutes.
- 28% faster code shipping for engineering teams
- Code reviews completed in minutes vs hours
AI coding tools outpaced manual review. Reasoning models now audit complex logic, cutting pull request cycles by up to 50%.
A developer tools platform serving over 5,000 customers and 70,000 open-source projects.
Generative AI enabled developers to write code faster than humans could review it, creating a bottleneck that slowed releases and allowed bugs to...
“You could generate a million lines of code. But if your review process only supports 1,000 lines, that’s all you’re shipping.”
AI-powered platform for automated code reviews and developer workflow optimization.
AI research and deployment company developing generative models and tools.
Related implementations across industries and use cases
Manual reviews couldn't keep pace. Claude now uses IDE tools to validate logic, cutting first reviews from hours to minutes.
Code reviews delayed releases while early AI hallucinated. Claude now validates logic to catch subtle bugs with one-click fixes.
Reviewers struggled to predict how code ripples through the system. AI now flags cross-service risks that cause outages.
Engineers manually correlated alerts across systems. AI agents now diagnose issues and suggest fixes, cutting recovery time by 35%.
Minor edits required days of crew coordination. Now, staff use avatars to modify dialogue and translate languages instantly.
Lab supply orders were handwritten in notebooks. Digital ordering now takes seconds, saving 30,000 hours for research annually.
Experts spent 15 minutes pulling data from scattered systems. Natural language prompts now generate detailed reports instantly.